|
Contacts
Address: Pr. Mira, 10, Vladikavkaz,
362040, RNO-A, Russia
E-mail: soigsi@mail.ru
|
DOI: 10.46698/VNC.2021.81.42.005
SPREAD OF AGRICULTURAL KNOWLEDGE AS A TREND OF CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC INTERACTIONS OF OSSETIA AND RUSSIA (SECOND HALF OF THE XIX – EARLY XX CENTURY).
Dzalaeva, Kamila R.
Izvestia SOIGSI. 2021. IIS 42 (81).
Abstract:
The problem of the formation of a multinational society has always been and remains
in the focus of scientific knowledge. It is of particular relevance for Russia, whose history is
a vivid example of the coexistence of many different peoples. The period of the second half of
the XIX – early XX centuries became an important milestone in the establishment of Russian
statehood in the North Caucasus. Ossetia participated in the modernization processes of the
post-reform period more actively than other North Caucasian territories. The transformation,
which in the course of these processes affected all spheres of life of the Ossetian society, gave
birth to new, more modern forms of socio-economic relations and contributed to the emergence
of new needs. Agriculture in particular and the agricultural sector as a whole are turning into
the main source of national wealth. The article examines the problem of cultural and economic
interaction between Ossetia and Russia in the conditions of reformism in the second half of the
19th – early 20th centuries, examines the main vectors of development of the Ossetian society
within the framework of this interaction. One of the most progressive directions is the striving
for the latest achievements in the field of agricultural activity, and the need to familiarize with
effective methods of running a personal economy is defined as the most important. The scientific
novelty of the work is due to the formulation of the problem, the involvement of new sources and
an interdisciplinary approach. The methodological basis was formed by the systemic-structural,
comparative-historical, interdisciplinary and civilizational approaches, the principles of
historicism, objectivity and integrity. The results obtained in the course of the study give grounds
to assert that one of the most important trends in cultural and economic interaction between
Ossetia and Russia in the period under review was the spread of agricultural knowledge among
the population of Ossetia through the development of a system of agricultural educational
institutions.
Keywords: Russia, Ossetia, cultural and economic interaction, agricultural activity, agricultural knowledge, agricultural education, cultural and economic integration
+ References1. Stebut, I.A. Sel’skokhozyaistvennoe znanie i sel’skokhozyaistvennoe obrazovanie [Agricultural
knowledge and agricultural education]. Sobr. soch. v 2 t. [Selected works in 2 vols]. Moscow,
1957. T. 2.
2. Kniga, M.D. Stanovlenie sel’skokhozyaistvennogo obrazovaniya v Rossii v XIX v. [Formation
of agricultural education in Russia in the XIX century]. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo
sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Saratov State Social and Economic
University]. 2007, no. 18(4), pp. 137-140.
3. Esikova, M.M. Sel’skokhozyaistvennoe obrazovanie v Rossii (vtoraya polovina XIX v. – 1917
g.) [Agricultural education in Russia (second half of the 19th century – 1917)]. Vlast’ [Power].
2010, no. 7, pp. 150-154.
4. Terskie vedomosti [Terek statements]. 1890, no. 2.
5. Terskie vedomosti [Terek statements]. 1890, no. 6.
6. Terskie vedomosti [Terek statements]. 1915, no. 179.
7. Ortabaev, B.Kh. Zemel’nye otnosheniya i razvitie kapitalizma v sel’skom khozyaistve Severnoi
Osetii v kontse XIX – nachale XX vekov (1890-1917 gg.) [Land relations and the development of
capitalism in agriculture in North Ossetia in the late 19th – early 20th centuries (1890-1917)].
Ordzhonikidze, North Ossetian State University, 1979. 78 p.
8. Tsagolov, G. Krai besprosvetnoi nuzhdy: Zametki o Nagornoi polose Terskoi oblasti [Land of
hopeless poverty: Notes on the Upland strip of the Terek region]. Vladikavkaz, Elektropech. tip.
Tersk. obl. pravl., 1912. 295 p.
9. Stat’i neofitsial’noi chasti «Terskikh vedomostei» za 1869 god [Articles of the unofficial part
of “Terek statements” for 1869]. Vladikavkaz, Tipogr. Tersk. obl. pravl., 1869.
10. Terskii kalendar’ na 1912 g. [Terek calendar for 1912]. Vladikavkaz: Elektropech. Tersk.
obl. pravl., 1912, iss. 21.
11. Terskie vedomosti [Terek statements]. 1913, no. 219.
12. Terskie vedomosti [Terek statements]. 1902, no. 25.
13. Ailarova, S.A. Periodicheskaya pechat’ kak element grazhdanskogo obshchestva v
khozyaistvenno-ekonomicheskoi sfere Severnogo Kavkaza v 60-70-e gg. XIX v. (na primere
«Terskikh vedomostei») [Periodicals as an element of civil society in economic sphere of the
North Caucasus in the 60-70s of the 19th century (on the example of “Terskie Vedomosti”)].
Kavkazologiya [Caucasology]. 2019, no. 1, pp. 43-66.
14. Terek [Terek]. 1909. № 3440.
15. Terskie vedomosti [Terek statements]. 1901, no. 67.
16. Terskie vedomosti [Terek statements]. 1909, no. 4.
17. Kavkaz [Caucasus]. 1914, no. 131.
18. Terskie vedomosti [Terek statements]. 1912, no. 15.
19. Terek [Terek]. 1916, no. 5464.
20. Stat’i neofitsial’noi chasti «Terskikh vedomostei» za 1874 god [Articles of the unofficial part
of “Terek statements” for 1874]. Vladikavkaz, Tipogr. Tersk. obl. pravl., 1874.
21. Terek [Terek]. 1917, no. 5706.
22. Terskie vedomosti [Terek statements]. 1907, no. 41.
23. Tsentral’nyi gosudarstvennyi arkhiv RSO-A [Central State Archives of the Republic of
North Ossetia-Alania]. Fund 11. Inventory 64. Case 209.
24. Terskie vedomosti [Terek statements]. 1914, no. 258.
25. Terskie vedomosti [Terek statements]. 1891.
26. Tretyakov, A.V. Formirovanie sistemy sel’skokhozyaistvennogo obrazovaniya v Rossii vtoroi
poloviny XIX – nachala XX vekov [Formation of the system of agricultural education in Russia in
the second half of the XIX – early XX centuries]. Nauchnye vedomosti. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya
[Scientific Statements. Series: History. Political science]. 2015, no. 13(210), iss. 35, pp. 103-110.
← Contents of issue
|
