|
Contacts
Address: Pr. Mira, 10, Vladikavkaz,
362040, RNO-A, Russia
E-mail: soigsi@mail.ru
|
DOI: 10.23671/VNC.2020.74.58005
SYSTEM OF PARTICIPLES IN THE OSSETIAN LANGUAGE COMPARED TO THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE.
Godizova, Zara I. , Gabisova, Dzerassa V.
Izvestia SOIGSI. 2020. IIS 35 (74).
Abstract:
The relevance of the undertaken study is determined by the fact that participles in the modern
Ossetian language are still insufficiently studied. There are only the most general descriptions of grammar
features of participles. The comparison of the system of participles and their grammar features seems
interesting and actual, especially considering the fact that the Ossetian and Russian languages belong
to different groups of the Indo-European language family. Furthermore, in the context of bilingualism
the Russian and Ossetian languages interact actively and that can affect the system of participles. The
scientific novelty of the article is determined by the fact that it examines the grammatical features of all
categories of participles in the Ossetian language in comparison with the Russian language. The conducted
research allowed to elicit five categories in the system of participles in the modern Ossetian language.
The analysis of the results showed the participles are diverse in their grammatical characteristics, in the
degree of regularity, and in the tendency to transition into other parts of speech. The research defined
the most significant differences between Ossetian and Russian participles: existence of future participles
in the system of the Ossetian language; absence of adjectival grammar categories of gender, number and
case as well as formal markers of tense and voice in Ossetian participles. The tense category in Ossetian
subordinates to the aspect category to a far greater extent; therefore the imperfective aspect of participles
accepts the present tense forms only, while perfective acts in the past tense forms; Ossetian participles
lack explicit voice opposition. Ossetian participles do not have full forms, but they can have syntactic
functions of both the predicate and the attribute in a sentence, although the predicative function is more
typical for them. Participles in the Ossetian language are much less common compared to participles
in Russian and are more disposed to conversion (transition to the category of nouns, verbal adverbs,
adjectives, words of the state category).
Keywords: Ossetian language, Russian language, participle, grammatical categories, categories of aspect, tense, voice, pledge, conversion.
+ References1. Abaev, V. I. O zalogovoi nedifferentsirovannosti prichastii [On voice differentiation lack
of participles]. Osetinskii yazyk i fol’klor [The Ossetian language and folklore]. Moscow-Leningrad,
USSR Academy of Scienses, 1949, vol. I, pp. 567‑571.
2. Abaev, V. I. Grammaticheskii ocherk osetinskogo yazyka [Grammatical essay on the Ossetian
language]. Ordzhonikidze, Severo-Osetinskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 1959. 168 p.
3. Bagaev, N. K. Sovremennyi osetinskii yazyk [The modern Ossetic language]. Ordzhonikidze,
Severo-Osetinskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 1965, vol. I. 487 p.
4. Akhvlediani, G. V. (ed.) Fonetika i morfologiya [Phonetics and morphology]. Grammatika
osetinskogo yazyka. V 2‑kh t. [Grammar of the Ossetic Language. In 2 vols]. Ordzhonikidze,
Researh Institute at the Council of Ministers of the North Ossetian ASSR, 1969, vol. I. 227 p.
5. Kunavin, B. V. Sopostavitel’naya kharakteristika prichastii v sovremennom russkom i osetinskom
yazykakh [Contrastive characteristics of participles in the modern Russian and Ossetic
languages]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Russkii yazyk
i yazyki narodov Rossii: funktsional’noe i strukturnoe vzaimodeistvie» [Proceedings of the
International Scientific and Practical Conference «The Russian Language and Languages of
the peoples of Russia: functional and structural interaction»]. Vladikavkaz, 2001, pp. 81‑86.
6. Kudzoeva, A. F., Kachmazova, E. S., Shafaghi, M. Sravnitel’no-sopostavitel’nyi analiz
prichastii v persidskom, russkom i osetinskom yazykakh [Comparative analysis of participles
in Persian, Russian, and Ossetian languages]. Izvestiya SOIGSI [Proceedings of the North
Ossetian Institute for Humanitarian and Social Studies]. 2018, iss. 30 (69), pp. 103‑111.
7. Kaitykty, A. Azæmæty tauræg»tæ [Tales of Azamat]. A. Kaitukov. Skazaniya [A. Kaitukov.
Legends]. Dzaudzhikau, Ir, 2004, 360 p. (in Ossetian)
8. Abaev V. I. (comp.). Russko-osetinskii slovar’ [Russian-Ossetian Dictionary. Ed. by
M. I. Isaev. 3rd ed.]. Moscow, Nauka, 2000. 583 p.
9. Gatsalova, L. B., Parsieva, L. K. Bol’shoi russko-osetinskii slovar’ [The Great Russian-Ossetian
Dictionary]. Vladikavkaz, North Ossetian Institute for Humanitarian and Social Studies,
2011. 690 p.
10. Bondarko, A. V. Vid i vremya russkogo glagola [Aspect and tense of the Russian verb].
Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 1971. 239 p.
11. Godizova, Z. I. Vidovremennye znacheniya prichastii sovershennogo vida [The
tense-aspect meanings of the perfective participles]. Candidate dissertation (in Philology).
Leningrad, 1992. 168 p.
12. Osnovy iranskogo yazykoznanija. Drevneiranskie yazyki [Essential Linguistics. Old
Iranian Languages]. Moscow, Nauka, 1979. 387 p.
13. Godizova, Z. I., Gabisova, D. V. Grammatical peculiarities of the participles in contemporary
Ossetic. Sed’maya mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya po iranskomu yazykoznaniyu
(ICIL7). Sbornik tezisov [Abstracts of the Seventh International Conference on Iranian Linguistics
(ICIL7). (Moscow, August 28‑30, 2017)]. Moscow, 2017, pp. 34‑36.
14. Marzoity, S. H»ysmæt: Uatsautæ. [Fate]. Dzaudzhikau, Ir, 2000. 392 p. (in Ossetian)
15. Dzasokhty, M. Dællag Ir [lower Ir]. Dzaudzhikau, Ir, 2007. 487 p. (in Ossetian)
← Contents of issue
|
